Scientism is to science what Colbert’s “truthiness” is to truth. Is that right? First time I’ve heard that—outstanding.
Billionaires likely trust, and therefore fund, models similar to what worked in making their billions. But you know how government isn’t business? Effective politics is even less so—it’s about society’s condition and people’s emotions and people’s emotions about society’s conditions.
A series of articles dropped yesterday about Ken Martin's inept DNC leadership.
in the months since he assumed office, he's managed to force out David Hogg, alienate top union members, fail to create a 2026 strategy, fail to formulate a message, fail to develop communications tactics, fail meet with Democratic incumbents, or even contact top Democratic donors.
What has he done?
Insist that looking back is counterproductive (while spending a small fortune on a 2024 audit), create a high-tech YouTube channel (which gathers less than 1,000 views), and accept a $50k raise (presumably for breathing).
I truly wonder whether Democratic leadership is interested in winning.
Plus why police on horses up high- very regale, on ‘No Kings Day’ - and pushing peaceful protesters along the street when they weren’t doing anything wrong? Ironic isn’t it?! I didn’t see horses other days. I mean using horses to intimidate an extremely well organised protest. Hats off to protesters- very peaceful. Very kind, good attitudes.
A Course in Miracles states as soon as we enter a conflict in response (paraphrasing) to an attack, we are in fact saying that the attack is acceptable. That we believe the bully’s thinking. That it is real. Trump is not clever. He is not brilliant. The yes men and woman who are around him are not as astute as you’re giving them credit for being. When we know the truth tell others bluntly - speculation about motives gets nowhere. Do you agree? And if not what would be your argument?
Plus love you too. Good duo. You compliment each other. 😁🙏☀️
Is the problem that the change to structure of the government? No more one person perhaps? What about a duo - I know they probably wouldn’t want it but can you imagine a partnership like Obama and Michelle? Simply for an example. A more balanced model with no one gender or personality as the sole Soul at the top. That keeps both in check. Trump used to be fun to watch remember before it got away from him. He’s so obviously using his footing.
A Course in Miracles states as soon as we enter a conflict in response (paraphrasing) to an attack, we are in fact saying that the attack is acceptable. That we believe the bully’s thinking. That it is real. Trump is not clever. He is not brilliant. The yes men and woman who are around him are not as astute as you’re giving them credit for being. When we know the truth tell others bluntly - speculation about motives gets nowhere. Do you agree? And if not what would be your argument?
Plus love you too. Good duo. You compliment each other. 😁🙏☀️
This is key. It’s the wars to make the lies true. Over and over. They hire the “beautiful liars” who don’t look like the classic villains to push this hate-baiting.
Maybe even growing your own globally appreciated leader. Just a thought if Zelenskyy was a democrat you’d have been pushing him forward. Boris Johnson even out of power was visiting as is the Truss woman different countries to preach. A democrat speaking sense right now regardless of power would amass it in every right (correct) thinking enclave of the world. Who is your charismatic? Train them, get them invites, sort yourselves out in your own time behind the scenes. The ‘scene’ now is global!!
Scientism is to science what Colbert’s “truthiness” is to truth. Is that right? First time I’ve heard that—outstanding.
Billionaires likely trust, and therefore fund, models similar to what worked in making their billions. But you know how government isn’t business? Effective politics is even less so—it’s about society’s condition and people’s emotions and people’s emotions about society’s conditions.
A series of articles dropped yesterday about Ken Martin's inept DNC leadership.
in the months since he assumed office, he's managed to force out David Hogg, alienate top union members, fail to create a 2026 strategy, fail to formulate a message, fail to develop communications tactics, fail meet with Democratic incumbents, or even contact top Democratic donors.
What has he done?
Insist that looking back is counterproductive (while spending a small fortune on a 2024 audit), create a high-tech YouTube channel (which gathers less than 1,000 views), and accept a $50k raise (presumably for breathing).
I truly wonder whether Democratic leadership is interested in winning.
Amat love your take and the spirit you show.
Plus why police on horses up high- very regale, on ‘No Kings Day’ - and pushing peaceful protesters along the street when they weren’t doing anything wrong? Ironic isn’t it?! I didn’t see horses other days. I mean using horses to intimidate an extremely well organised protest. Hats off to protesters- very peaceful. Very kind, good attitudes.
A Course in Miracles states as soon as we enter a conflict in response (paraphrasing) to an attack, we are in fact saying that the attack is acceptable. That we believe the bully’s thinking. That it is real. Trump is not clever. He is not brilliant. The yes men and woman who are around him are not as astute as you’re giving them credit for being. When we know the truth tell others bluntly - speculation about motives gets nowhere. Do you agree? And if not what would be your argument?
Plus love you too. Good duo. You compliment each other. 😁🙏☀️
Is the problem that the change to structure of the government? No more one person perhaps? What about a duo - I know they probably wouldn’t want it but can you imagine a partnership like Obama and Michelle? Simply for an example. A more balanced model with no one gender or personality as the sole Soul at the top. That keeps both in check. Trump used to be fun to watch remember before it got away from him. He’s so obviously using his footing.
A Course in Miracles states as soon as we enter a conflict in response (paraphrasing) to an attack, we are in fact saying that the attack is acceptable. That we believe the bully’s thinking. That it is real. Trump is not clever. He is not brilliant. The yes men and woman who are around him are not as astute as you’re giving them credit for being. When we know the truth tell others bluntly - speculation about motives gets nowhere. Do you agree? And if not what would be your argument?
Plus love you too. Good duo. You compliment each other. 😁🙏☀️
This is key. It’s the wars to make the lies true. Over and over. They hire the “beautiful liars” who don’t look like the classic villains to push this hate-baiting.
Maybe even growing your own globally appreciated leader. Just a thought if Zelenskyy was a democrat you’d have been pushing him forward. Boris Johnson even out of power was visiting as is the Truss woman different countries to preach. A democrat speaking sense right now regardless of power would amass it in every right (correct) thinking enclave of the world. Who is your charismatic? Train them, get them invites, sort yourselves out in your own time behind the scenes. The ‘scene’ now is global!!