Heather got on it the next day. Her face animated and saying, "this is a really big deal" without DUE PROCESS. She made something many people had never heard of front page...immediately.
I love your podcasts. I concur with everything in this analysis. Thanks again. FYI, www.wethepeoplesoar.com is now live! Get the message and protest gear there. Thank you all!
This post election analysis ignores revelations re what looks like tampering w voting machines-Leonard Leo/Eaton/Palantir/em and helps explain the bizarre results which defy electoral reality-all 7 swing states but not an electoral blowout, zero Harris votes in D districts etc
It could be flim flam but given what we see now, what we know about 2016, even 2000, what the folks involved have said publicly about the vote- it seems at least worth investigation-they are lying about everything happening now-asking those involved isn't likely to get good answers. But I also don't want to spread disinformation - just would like there to be some awareness that none of this is normal, the results weren't normal given a lack of a landslide, a coup was attempted in 2021, the candidate's behavior pre 2024 election was not that of someone trying to "convince" voters, he indeed said he didn't need them...so, why? Also, we now see their plan unfolding w military in CA is not to put down riots but to displace democratically elected officials, per Noem's words
Thank you so much! You were spot on when articulating that Dem “strategists” saying they need to message one thing at a time is just an out so they don’t have to admit they don’t care about certain fundamental rights for certain people. There’s a palpable difference between a Bernie Sanders, who as a legislator naturally gives a lot of air time to legislation but still raises an authentic voice against tyranny, and a person who can only be animated by one message. Key problem for Dems is, as they accepted $$$ from wealthy donors and self-interested PACS, they had to trade a bit of their humanity for that support. Honestly, their #1 issue will always be their own survival, and increasingly their own prosperity. They can drum up passion about one or two things, but they always have in the back of their head the voice and interest of those who fund them. So adopting an idea like “good billionaires” means there’s way less time, space, and concern for the marginalized and targeted. If they relied on a different cohort for votes, they’d be more free to express bedrock human emotions about egregious human rights abuses.
You have to HAVE passion to express it authentically. Predominating self-interest will necessarily redirect that passion. Passionate people invest themselves. “Strategic” lawmakers and other spokespeople invest their logic machine within a framework of what works for them.
Heather got on it the next day. Her face animated and saying, "this is a really big deal" without DUE PROCESS. She made something many people had never heard of front page...immediately.
I love your podcasts. I concur with everything in this analysis. Thanks again. FYI, www.wethepeoplesoar.com is now live! Get the message and protest gear there. Thank you all!
So appreciate this refocus of the conversation about and among Dems
This post election analysis ignores revelations re what looks like tampering w voting machines-Leonard Leo/Eaton/Palantir/em and helps explain the bizarre results which defy electoral reality-all 7 swing states but not an electoral blowout, zero Harris votes in D districts etc
Where are these revelations? Any links or other citations you can provide?
This is involving county in NY but others have found anomalies in PA, NV suggesting outcomes not representative of voting behavior https://www.newsweek.com/judge-2024-election-lawsuit-timeline-2084468
thanks.
It could be flim flam but given what we see now, what we know about 2016, even 2000, what the folks involved have said publicly about the vote- it seems at least worth investigation-they are lying about everything happening now-asking those involved isn't likely to get good answers. But I also don't want to spread disinformation - just would like there to be some awareness that none of this is normal, the results weren't normal given a lack of a landslide, a coup was attempted in 2021, the candidate's behavior pre 2024 election was not that of someone trying to "convince" voters, he indeed said he didn't need them...so, why? Also, we now see their plan unfolding w military in CA is not to put down riots but to displace democratically elected officials, per Noem's words
What about the anger about the deceit that people are reacting to.
Revoke your vote. Call 202 224 3121.
Thank you so much! You were spot on when articulating that Dem “strategists” saying they need to message one thing at a time is just an out so they don’t have to admit they don’t care about certain fundamental rights for certain people. There’s a palpable difference between a Bernie Sanders, who as a legislator naturally gives a lot of air time to legislation but still raises an authentic voice against tyranny, and a person who can only be animated by one message. Key problem for Dems is, as they accepted $$$ from wealthy donors and self-interested PACS, they had to trade a bit of their humanity for that support. Honestly, their #1 issue will always be their own survival, and increasingly their own prosperity. They can drum up passion about one or two things, but they always have in the back of their head the voice and interest of those who fund them. So adopting an idea like “good billionaires” means there’s way less time, space, and concern for the marginalized and targeted. If they relied on a different cohort for votes, they’d be more free to express bedrock human emotions about egregious human rights abuses.
You have to HAVE passion to express it authentically. Predominating self-interest will necessarily redirect that passion. Passionate people invest themselves. “Strategic” lawmakers and other spokespeople invest their logic machine within a framework of what works for them.